Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 3 March 2011

Attack continues on ProcessLasso.com

Posted on 14:48 by Unknown
Despite a sterling reputation for 10 years, I've been ANONYMOUSLY attacked here: http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/processlasso.com ... The only defense I have is my users. So, please take the time to rate my site whatever you believe I deserve. I am partly being blamed for the banning of a reviewer (bot with 2+ million reviews) at McAfee SiteAdvisor who had made highly defamatory remarks about my site by mistake (generic text). He then recanted, but his first recant was more offensive than the accusation even (as if he and his lists were infallible). So, he recanted a second time. I didn't mention him again, but SiteAdvisor later removed his account and now I'm being blamed. As soon as his account was banned, this attack happened. Coincidence I'm sure.

I had MyWOT fix the initial attack, which occurred right as this ever-so-ethical, self-appointed guardian reviewer was banned. However, then his friend stepped in and complicated matters by bringing up stuff he knew to be long resolved at SiteAdvisor (they dug up my butt for a long time before correcting their false positive). So, MyWOT then UNFIXED the problem, and now I'm left only with my users to defend me.

These rating systems have all the power in the world, and this is the most important domain (obviously). It is my only profit generating product! (small profit, mind you, lol).

I am glad to say that users have come to my defense and properly rated me GREEN/SAFE in every category at EVERY rating service. Thank you ;). It is good to see a community come together, and nice to know that I am appreciated ;)
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Process Lasso v3.65.3 beta released
    I've released the first new beta that is 100% UNICODE. I've regression tested almost all the software, though there may still be som...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.28
    This build continues maintenance, fixing several items and also making a nice improvement to the graph's display. Further, the last sele...
  • v5.0.0.18: Fix auto updater in XP
    During testing a few hours ago I noticed the auto-update was failing in some XP installations. Specifically, it would appear to stall at the...
  • BETA: Vista startup configuration
    Ok, I've got this fully correct now I think. In some cases in previous builds you could end up with both registry and Task Scheduler sta...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.48
    Changes: [.48]Change.GUI: Do not show 'Activate Now' menu item after activation [.48]Change.GUI: Adjusted logging thread CPU and I/O...
  • v5.0.0.17 final - Minor fixes
    This build fixes a reported issue with the watchdog rules (re: not default affinities, priorities, power schemes, but rather the terminate/r...
  • v5.0.0.21: Fix failure of web links within Process Lasso on some systems
    I've had reports of sporadic failure of the web links within Process Lasso. I've analyzed this situation for a while today and found...
  • One bit of bad news, one bit of good news
    One disappointing thing is that I've decided to cancel the change history shown in the update dialog, at least for v4.1. I may add it in...
  • Oh the frustration with this corporate crapware!!
    I now get uninstall feedback, as I solicit it (for better or worse). Once read, I can never go back, lol. Fortunately, most of it is actuall...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2012 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ▼  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ▼  March (27)
      • v4.09.33 beta released
      • One bit of bad news, one bit of good news
      • A new warning about foreground boosting snake-oil
      • v4.1 summary - what is, and what will be
      • New 'Default Power Scheme' to replace 'High Perfor...
      • Portable Editon
      • New rounded corners for users of IE and Opera
      • QA pre v4.1 stable/final
      • v4.00.34 final/stable minor update released
      • Process Lasso v4.09.31 beta released
      • Reminder: Do not download 'cracked' copies of our ...
      • New Win7 x64 SP1 fresh install
      • BETA: Quickly cornering final crashes/problems
      • BETA: New automated updater - How'd you like?
      • v4.09.30 BETA released
      • BETA: Vista startup configuration
      • News from Japan: Our Japanese reseller and his fam...
      • BETA: Ok, trying to finish it again today
      • BETA: Fixed W2K and WXP pre-SP2 (lack of) minidump...
      • Engaged at full speed
      • Thank you for your continued crash dump submission...
      • Sorry, fixing startup config issues in Vista+
      • W2K Users: Latest beta has problems, am fixing
      • New beta coming, next 12 hours or so
      • Code review and bug tracking continues
      • Back in the saddle, 'with it' again
      • Attack continues on ProcessLasso.com
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile