Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 27 March 2011

A new warning about foreground boosting snake-oil

Posted on 16:42 by Unknown
Every so many months I issue a new warning about these programs out there that claim to boost performance by increasing the priority class of the foreground application (though they usually just say 'Increase PC performance by 100%' or whatever absurd claim they feel like).

Windows already does foreground boosting. At Bitsum we have extensively studied the Windows scheduler, and foreground boosting. Although Process Lasso offers optional foreground boosting, when you turn it on you get a warning about all this. The ProBalanace algorithm makes no use of it at all. Why not?

As I say elsewhere, foreground boosting can cause real problems. First, it has no effect of boosting the performance of anything since Windows already does a form of foreground boosting (longer time slices and slight elevation in priority). Second, many programs simply 'don't play nice with it'. Third, poor implementations of it are even worse, as they can interefere with application self-set priorities and such.

Although ProBalance does NOT use foreground boosting, also let me say that  it took me considerable time and user feedback to get Process Lasso's ProBalance 'right', even continuing to tweak it to this day! Hardware and software environments change, so it has to adapt with them. It takes true dedication. Process priorities aren't something that should be messed with irresponsibly.

Stay far away from any of these programs. They are continually renamed, re-branded, and coming out of some newly founded company. When one company's reputation sinks, they start another. The most recent one I saw permanently disables UAC when you install it, if you can believe that!! (with no notification, nor reversion/undo on uninstall).

Be careful when you are trying ANY new software, make sure you trust the company FIRST. Don't install their software to 'find out'. First, check them out. Read. Use your intuition. Do they seem good? Check multiple rating sites using places like URLVoid.com. While sometimes these rating sites make mistakes, you can see the reason for the rating and determine if it is a valid rating or not.

I don't want to mention the violators because it will attract them. My days as a crime fighter are over, I will leave that up to end users ;). I know you are smarter than this, make sure they know too!

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.28
    This build continues maintenance, fixing several items and also making a nice improvement to the graph's display. Further, the last sele...
  • Anti-virus software - the #1 cause of PC performance troubles
    Many users realize their anti-virus software consumes massive amounts of system resources, and hope that Process Lasso will somehow keep it ...
  • Next update, Options menu gets some changes
    I decided to make the Options menu a little more consistent and move the ProBalnce configuration down with the rest of the rules configurati...
  • Optimizing process icon memory use & New core feature coming..
    Two in one post. Yes, here at Bitsum we're going Green by conserving bandwidth ;). Of course, that's just a joke and I fully support...
  • Indonesian language added - That makes 11
    Thanks to the work of Ivan Chin, an Indonesian (Bahasa Melayu) translation will be included in v3.99.36. This will be the first time even he...
  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Tightening the Governor
    Most users of Process Lasso are familiar with its core engine, ProcessGovernor.exe. It is the silent background process that applies all pro...
  • The many instances of Chrome
    As many readers of this blog may know, Google Chrome is different from other Windows web browsers. It isolates each of its tabs into an indi...
  • Process Lasso and WDFME
    Since Process Lasso can be complex for the layman, something we are working on, I wanted to list a set of steps to address the commonly abu...
  • BETA: Vista startup configuration
    Ok, I've got this fully correct now I think. In some cases in previous builds you could end up with both registry and Task Scheduler sta...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2012 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ▼  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ▼  March (27)
      • v4.09.33 beta released
      • One bit of bad news, one bit of good news
      • A new warning about foreground boosting snake-oil
      • v4.1 summary - what is, and what will be
      • New 'Default Power Scheme' to replace 'High Perfor...
      • Portable Editon
      • New rounded corners for users of IE and Opera
      • QA pre v4.1 stable/final
      • v4.00.34 final/stable minor update released
      • Process Lasso v4.09.31 beta released
      • Reminder: Do not download 'cracked' copies of our ...
      • New Win7 x64 SP1 fresh install
      • BETA: Quickly cornering final crashes/problems
      • BETA: New automated updater - How'd you like?
      • v4.09.30 BETA released
      • BETA: Vista startup configuration
      • News from Japan: Our Japanese reseller and his fam...
      • BETA: Ok, trying to finish it again today
      • BETA: Fixed W2K and WXP pre-SP2 (lack of) minidump...
      • Engaged at full speed
      • Thank you for your continued crash dump submission...
      • Sorry, fixing startup config issues in Vista+
      • W2K Users: Latest beta has problems, am fixing
      • New beta coming, next 12 hours or so
      • Code review and bug tracking continues
      • Back in the saddle, 'with it' again
      • Attack continues on ProcessLasso.com
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile