Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 5 September 2012

Surprising Benchmarks on AMD Processors - Why the old Phenom II x6 remains a great CPU

Posted on 20:15 by Unknown

Surprising Benchmarks on AMD Processors

The good old x6 Phenom II performs *almost* as fast as the latest unreleased generation of AMD processors!

Remember the last processor AMD made before Bulldozer? The Phenom II? Remember its x6 rendition, the 1100T and its smaller brother the 1050T (iirc). Of course, *now* what were originally all physical processors in the first AMD Bulldozer processor, the 1150 x8, are considered pairs of logical processors. This means that the AMD 1150 would today be marketed as having 4 physical cores, and has been treated by the Windows CPU Scheduler ever since a hotfix to it shortly after the release of Bulldozer.

Well, check out this latest Benchmark from ExtremeTech ...


The good old x6 Phenom II performs *almost* as fast as the latest unreleased generation of AMD processors, running at 700mhz less clock speed! Further, NONE have more than 4 physical cores (as advertised anyway, count them as you prefer I guess).

Therefore, the AMD Phenom II x6 is perhaps the last AMD processor to have 6 fully independent cores for some time. Perhaps they may even command a market premium for this (or should).

The only *problem* is that the AMD Phenom II was constantly in a state of boosting some core frequencies, using its TurboBoost technology. They couldn't clock the whole chip at full load that high, but could clock a few cores a bit higher if the load was not too great. Thus, they made this compromise, but it results in a chip that really has to 'work for its money'.






Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Process Lasso v3.65.3 beta released
    I've released the first new beta that is 100% UNICODE. I've regression tested almost all the software, though there may still be som...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.28
    This build continues maintenance, fixing several items and also making a nice improvement to the graph's display. Further, the last sele...
  • v5.0.0.18: Fix auto updater in XP
    During testing a few hours ago I noticed the auto-update was failing in some XP installations. Specifically, it would appear to stall at the...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.48
    Changes: [.48]Change.GUI: Do not show 'Activate Now' menu item after activation [.48]Change.GUI: Adjusted logging thread CPU and I/O...
  • One bit of bad news, one bit of good news
    One disappointing thing is that I've decided to cancel the change history shown in the update dialog, at least for v4.1. I may add it in...
  • Version 6 Goes Final
    Version 6 Goes Final as v6.0.0.58 I don't even know where to start with the changes, so I'm going to refer you to two documents. Nei...
  • Smaller minidumps means more submissions
    One of the changes in the last build was that I reduced the size of the minidumps that are generated in the rare event of a crash. They have...
  • 5.0.0.9 beta
    Sadly, my change in version naming did confuse some users who thought v5 was final already. Well, it is close, but not there --- I am rapidl...
  • Code review and bug tracking continues
    This is the tedious part of pre-release work ;o. I will release a new beta though, as soon as I possibly can. Although I've got new prob...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ▼  2012 (6)
    • ▼  September (1)
      • Surprising Benchmarks on AMD Processors - Why the ...
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile