Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 14 March 2011

New Win7 x64 SP1 fresh install

Posted on 09:08 by Unknown
Well, I set back up my primary development physical machine in record time. I do development on it up until the point I reach final, then switch to the virtual machine (and continue beta development on the physical machine). Anyway, the installation of Windows 7 SP1 went foobar'd on this PC because I had installed a pre-release of it. Now, according to all documentation, this pre-release would clearly be listed on the installed Windows updates. It was not. Besides, the backup files it needs had long been deleted. Compounding my problems was trying to squeeze Windows 7 into a 50GB SSD. It works good at first, but trust me when I say that just isn't enough for the OS. I redirected about everything to my HDDs, but the usage kept growing. In the end, I didn't even have enough disk space to install any service pack anyway ;o.

SO, fresh new Windows install and I like it. Even with Windows 7, for whatever reason, a fresh install feels and runs so nice. I put that SSD to use as a page file. Honestly, that's all it is good for at this point. The Hybrid drives may be the future for the next while, SSDs just haven't the capacity yet (unless you are rich I suppose). Of course, the primary advantage of an SSD, for those who don't know, is that there is no seek time. It is like RAM, in that it can instantly read any address. Sadly, it can't write quite as fast because a write incurs a read/modify/erase cycle on an entire block. Also, sustained data transfer rate isn't as fast as you'd think. A defragmented HDD with no other I/O requests can serve you up a large file quicker than affordable SSDs. I say affordable because I got a cheap one, though it is second gen (I missed the first gen). They've since improved, and it was really only my free space issue that caused any performance problem.

I've already got the build environment set up and already rebuilt PL, so all is good to go. I noticed during my initial install that the BETA (only) was improperly telling people Terminal Services needed to be started in Vista+. So, one good thing did come from this.

I'm now going to dive straight into these minidumps, as this is bug fixes only. I have to get this release out ASAP, or issue a new final with some back-ports (minor adjustments and fixes... e.g. no more graph tooltips that quit working over time.. something fixed long ago in the beta).

Wish me luck in my continued endeavors ;)
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Process Lasso v3.65.3 beta released
    I've released the first new beta that is 100% UNICODE. I've regression tested almost all the software, though there may still be som...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.28
    This build continues maintenance, fixing several items and also making a nice improvement to the graph's display. Further, the last sele...
  • v5.0.0.18: Fix auto updater in XP
    During testing a few hours ago I noticed the auto-update was failing in some XP installations. Specifically, it would appear to stall at the...
  • BETA: Vista startup configuration
    Ok, I've got this fully correct now I think. In some cases in previous builds you could end up with both registry and Task Scheduler sta...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.48
    Changes: [.48]Change.GUI: Do not show 'Activate Now' menu item after activation [.48]Change.GUI: Adjusted logging thread CPU and I/O...
  • v5.0.0.17 final - Minor fixes
    This build fixes a reported issue with the watchdog rules (re: not default affinities, priorities, power schemes, but rather the terminate/r...
  • v5.0.0.21: Fix failure of web links within Process Lasso on some systems
    I've had reports of sporadic failure of the web links within Process Lasso. I've analyzed this situation for a while today and found...
  • One bit of bad news, one bit of good news
    One disappointing thing is that I've decided to cancel the change history shown in the update dialog, at least for v4.1. I may add it in...
  • Oh the frustration with this corporate crapware!!
    I now get uninstall feedback, as I solicit it (for better or worse). Once read, I can never go back, lol. Fortunately, most of it is actuall...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2012 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ▼  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ▼  March (27)
      • v4.09.33 beta released
      • One bit of bad news, one bit of good news
      • A new warning about foreground boosting snake-oil
      • v4.1 summary - what is, and what will be
      • New 'Default Power Scheme' to replace 'High Perfor...
      • Portable Editon
      • New rounded corners for users of IE and Opera
      • QA pre v4.1 stable/final
      • v4.00.34 final/stable minor update released
      • Process Lasso v4.09.31 beta released
      • Reminder: Do not download 'cracked' copies of our ...
      • New Win7 x64 SP1 fresh install
      • BETA: Quickly cornering final crashes/problems
      • BETA: New automated updater - How'd you like?
      • v4.09.30 BETA released
      • BETA: Vista startup configuration
      • News from Japan: Our Japanese reseller and his fam...
      • BETA: Ok, trying to finish it again today
      • BETA: Fixed W2K and WXP pre-SP2 (lack of) minidump...
      • Engaged at full speed
      • Thank you for your continued crash dump submission...
      • Sorry, fixing startup config issues in Vista+
      • W2K Users: Latest beta has problems, am fixing
      • New beta coming, next 12 hours or so
      • Code review and bug tracking continues
      • Back in the saddle, 'with it' again
      • Attack continues on ProcessLasso.com
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile