Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 9 June 2011

Fix for Windows 2000 users coming next build

Posted on 19:05 by Unknown
I've fixed a crash in the GUI seen in Windows 2000. It was caused by use of the new process icon resolution code, which depended on newer APIs not available in Windows 2000. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that Windows 2000 is still in use. For many tasks I do suppose it is a viable OS and there is no reason to change. Of course, many vendors have dropped support for it, but I have restored proper support in v5. This will be in v5.0.0.27, which is coming shortly.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Process Lasso v3.65.3 beta released
    I've released the first new beta that is 100% UNICODE. I've regression tested almost all the software, though there may still be som...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.28
    This build continues maintenance, fixing several items and also making a nice improvement to the graph's display. Further, the last sele...
  • v5.0.0.18: Fix auto updater in XP
    During testing a few hours ago I noticed the auto-update was failing in some XP installations. Specifically, it would appear to stall at the...
  • BETA: Vista startup configuration
    Ok, I've got this fully correct now I think. In some cases in previous builds you could end up with both registry and Task Scheduler sta...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.48
    Changes: [.48]Change.GUI: Do not show 'Activate Now' menu item after activation [.48]Change.GUI: Adjusted logging thread CPU and I/O...
  • v5.0.0.17 final - Minor fixes
    This build fixes a reported issue with the watchdog rules (re: not default affinities, priorities, power schemes, but rather the terminate/r...
  • v5.0.0.21: Fix failure of web links within Process Lasso on some systems
    I've had reports of sporadic failure of the web links within Process Lasso. I've analyzed this situation for a while today and found...
  • One bit of bad news, one bit of good news
    One disappointing thing is that I've decided to cancel the change history shown in the update dialog, at least for v4.1. I may add it in...
  • Oh the frustration with this corporate crapware!!
    I now get uninstall feedback, as I solicit it (for better or worse). Once read, I can never go back, lol. Fortunately, most of it is actuall...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2012 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ▼  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ▼  June (17)
      • v5.0.0.30 released
      • Process Lasso v5.0.0.29
      • Forum RSS feeds now primary release notification
      • v5.0.0.28 graph change
      • CPU Parking revisited: How to enable or disable CP...
      • Process Lasso v5.0.0.28
      • Windows XP w/o Terminal Services config file reset...
      • v5.0.0.27: A few fixes and restores Windows 2000 s...
      • Fix for Windows 2000 users coming next build
      • Betanews publishes Process Lasso v5 release article
      • v5.0.0.26: A few very minor adjustments
      • v5.0.0.25: Portable Edition goes final, command li...
      • Portable Edition: Changing distribution format
      • Product description and marketing maintenance
      • v5.0.0.24: Re-enable full self memory optimizations
      • v5.0.0.23: Fix some minor issues, larger update be...
      • New minor update coming soon
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile