Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 5 June 2011

Product description and marketing maintenance

Posted on 10:11 by Unknown
I've been working on improving the product description, updating the web pages and site, and creating some new marketing images. Frankly, few people realize the true capabilities of Process Lasso. There is nothing more annoying than having people quickly dismiss it as yet another task manager. Of course, if they read the existing description they'd know that isn't true, but still it is frustrating. Towards this end I've planned some new ways to convey the multitude of features. I've also got a new web site design in progress, something I've wanted for a while as frankly I am sick of looking at the existing web site. Sadly, one of the hardest things in the world for me is to make things look attractive, though I suppose that is obvious ;).

I've also decided to reduce the frequency of the nags in the next version, as I don't want them to be too annoying. The advanced features should be what compels purchase, and honestly I don't think the existing nags are very annoying. I often run the free version myself for weeks on end, and they aren't annoying enough to me to register my own program. Still, they can be toned down a little without any major effect on licensing, so I'll be doing that. Keep in mind these fast click-through nags with *NO* timer are vastly preferred over what many freeware programs do: add toolbars and other crap to the installer. Those who complain about the nags should consider the alternatives, and I mean *real* alternatives that take into account the real world.

Of course, my licensing aggressiveness typically goes up and down, as I struggle to find and maintain a balance. I want Process Lasso to be as free as possible, that's the absolute truth. However, I also simply must generate enough revenue to cover the costs of Process Lasso and my other projects. Heck, web hosting and related services alone cost me $200 a month now. The automated updater was a part of that, as I simply had to have a reliable primary web server if I was going to offer automated updates. I got by on shared servers for many years, but this year it became clear my time with shared hosts was over.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Process Lasso v3.65.3 beta released
    I've released the first new beta that is 100% UNICODE. I've regression tested almost all the software, though there may still be som...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.28
    This build continues maintenance, fixing several items and also making a nice improvement to the graph's display. Further, the last sele...
  • v5.0.0.18: Fix auto updater in XP
    During testing a few hours ago I noticed the auto-update was failing in some XP installations. Specifically, it would appear to stall at the...
  • BETA: Vista startup configuration
    Ok, I've got this fully correct now I think. In some cases in previous builds you could end up with both registry and Task Scheduler sta...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.48
    Changes: [.48]Change.GUI: Do not show 'Activate Now' menu item after activation [.48]Change.GUI: Adjusted logging thread CPU and I/O...
  • v5.0.0.17 final - Minor fixes
    This build fixes a reported issue with the watchdog rules (re: not default affinities, priorities, power schemes, but rather the terminate/r...
  • v5.0.0.21: Fix failure of web links within Process Lasso on some systems
    I've had reports of sporadic failure of the web links within Process Lasso. I've analyzed this situation for a while today and found...
  • One bit of bad news, one bit of good news
    One disappointing thing is that I've decided to cancel the change history shown in the update dialog, at least for v4.1. I may add it in...
  • Oh the frustration with this corporate crapware!!
    I now get uninstall feedback, as I solicit it (for better or worse). Once read, I can never go back, lol. Fortunately, most of it is actuall...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2012 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ▼  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ▼  June (17)
      • v5.0.0.30 released
      • Process Lasso v5.0.0.29
      • Forum RSS feeds now primary release notification
      • v5.0.0.28 graph change
      • CPU Parking revisited: How to enable or disable CP...
      • Process Lasso v5.0.0.28
      • Windows XP w/o Terminal Services config file reset...
      • v5.0.0.27: A few fixes and restores Windows 2000 s...
      • Fix for Windows 2000 users coming next build
      • Betanews publishes Process Lasso v5 release article
      • v5.0.0.26: A few very minor adjustments
      • v5.0.0.25: Portable Edition goes final, command li...
      • Portable Edition: Changing distribution format
      • Product description and marketing maintenance
      • v5.0.0.24: Re-enable full self memory optimizations
      • v5.0.0.23: Fix some minor issues, larger update be...
      • New minor update coming soon
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile