Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 28 September 2010

Windows 2000 and Windows XP pre-SP2: v4 support is returning

Posted on 00:55 by Unknown
It turns out that VC 10's (Visual Studio 2010) common runtime libs use functions only available in XP with SP2. So, this was the core of the remaining incompatibility. I've fixed this now. I simply reverted the SDK used to VC9, while using Visual Studio 2010. The issue was the new DecodePointer and EncodePoitner APIs (if not others). These nearly useless security APIs were added to XP SP2 in attempt to protect pointer addresses from being 'known' at runtime. I guess it was a good idea, but they are not very useful with other things like ASLR now available.

So, I guess Microsoft quit caring about pre-SP2 XP and Windows 2000 ... but not us. I told you v4 would remain compatible, and compatibility should be restored in the next build. I'm sorry you Windows 2000 and XP pre-SP2 users have missed out so far. You will like what you see when you do catch up ;).

Of course, v3.84.7 (the last final) works FINE on both Windows 2000 and Windows XP SP0.
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Monday, 27 September 2010

v3.99.32 beta - Fix that View menu, but don't update if you're Russian

Posted on 19:31 by Unknown
Since the alternate ways to hide/show columns are somewhat "an insider's secret" (see below), I decided to issue an interim beta build to fix the View menu and also disable the Russian translation pending an update. It is the last translation still using a resource script and therefore more sensitive to changes than my languages.

So, there is v3.99.32 beta ;). All the cool new stuff I was working on got disabled for now, sorry. It was better to disable them than have them as-is, trust me. This build should be pretty good... it has tested well so far, but I do not do extensive tests of betas.

Tonight I'm focusing more on fixes, so if I haven't gotten to your bug report yet, I likely will. I hope everyone enjoys tomorrow, if I don't have a chance to say 'Good Morning' ;)
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Selecting which columns are shown - 3 different ways

Posted on 14:50 by Unknown
It was brought to my attention that, in the last beta build, I accidentally broke the 'View / Select columns to show' sub-menu. There are TWO other ways to get to the column selection menu that do work. One is to right-click on the tab, the other is to right-click on the listview header. Either will show a popup menu with all the possible columns -- then you can check/uncheck to hide/show those columns. This works for BOTH the 'All Processes' *and* 'Active Processes' listviews.

Some users have complained that their process column settings were lost in recent beta upgrades. This happens whenever I add or remove a column. Since such changes are rare, it is simply best to 'put up' with them being reset during some upgrades ;o. The complexity and development time of a system to try to preserve your listview settings even when those listviews have had substantial changes made just isn't worth it, I'm sorry.

Well, here I go, trying my best to get this done ... I do have more good news - The graph tooltips are on display in my internal build here. I'm not quite happy with them yet, but they are here. I'm also fixing little GUI quirks left and right.

Version 4 will be here before you know it.
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Saturday, 25 September 2010

Actual time spent in restraint also added to processes

Posted on 19:58 by Unknown
At the suggestion of Scott Danesi, perhaps through an initial misinterpretation, I also added the time spent in restraint to the 'Time Restrained' column. There was extra space there anyway since the header text was so comparatively large.











NOTE: Screenshot actually of v3.99.32 internal, so may have cosmetic differences from v3.99.31.

As you can see, one of many benefits of Process Lasso is that it greatly improves system responsiveness during builds with Visual Studio (especially the heavy-weight Visual Studio 2010). The restrained processes are all helper processes VS2010 launches during the build process.

---
I also fixed an issue with system tray tooltip truncation in Vista/Win7 that popped up in the last beta (but no other build).

I am now completing my 'task list' and going for gold here...

v3.99.31 beta will be uploaded within minutes.
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Friday, 24 September 2010

v3.99.30 - New process 'status' column shows restrained processes, times restrained, and more [coming]

Posted on 23:14 by Unknown
I told you that inter-process communication rewrite would have plentiful benefits. One is that the new Status column added as a placeholder in v3.99.29 beta will show is a process is actively being restrained or not. It will show 'restrained' up until the point that the Probalance action has ended.

(remember: Not shown in v3.99.29 even though the Status column is there)


Notice the new 'Times Restrained' column too, an oft-requested feature.

I've also fixed truncated system tray tooltips in XP. This would have actually fixed itself, as the cause was the long version number resulting in a string that was too long, inducing a fail-safe system tray tooltip.

Several languages were updated, including French, Polish, and Italian... but that is true of nearly every build.
Publish Post
I continue to go through the known bugs and things todo list. I'll upload this new build in about 6 hours after I post this, with as much additional progress I've made at that time.

Oh, and for those that hate that new RAM Load graph I added - as of yesterday's public beta (v3.99.29) I've provided a way to hide it by pressing CTRL+R or using the View menu.
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Wednesday, 22 September 2010

v3.99.28 beta - Better looks, cleaner resizing, etc..

Posted on 21:45 by Unknown
New beta with continued polishing ....
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Tuesday, 21 September 2010

v3.99.27 beta - cleaning things up

Posted on 18:56 by Unknown
Beta builds are going to be coming 'rapid fire' until I'm done. I've only seen benefits from this, as users provide me immediately with feedback. This new beta cleans several things up, fixes a few reported bugs and anomalies, and has more coming.
Read More
Posted in | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Licensed user update dialog - Activation code will be automatically populated in license validation box
    Licensed User Update Dialog  - Activation code will be automatically populated in license validation box First, to be clear, the license val...
  • No more COM
    Years ago I wrote my process enumeration and management module. It primarily uses the NT Native API, giving it extended capabilities over th...
  • Process Lasso v3.65.3 beta released
    I've released the first new beta that is 100% UNICODE. I've regression tested almost all the software, though there may still be som...
  • Nag annoyance reduced
    The battle to come up with a tolerable licensing system continues. I struggle with this, as I want my software to be completely free. Howeve...
  • Licensing changes ... Yes, I still call it Free. Do you?
    Starting in Process Lasso v3.50, there have been a few minor changes to the licensing. The free build has these changes: ADDED a system tray...
  • Surprising Benchmarks on AMD Processors - Why the old Phenom II x6 remains a great CPU
    Surprising Benchmarks on AMD Processors The good old x6 Phenom II performs *almost* as fast as the latest unreleased generation of AMD proce...
  • Nag screen changes
    Hi my loyal Process Lasso users and friends. Yes, that's right, I've made many new friends during this project ;) I just wanted to l...
  • Version 6 Goes Final
    Version 6 Goes Final as v6.0.0.58 I don't even know where to start with the changes, so I'm going to refer you to two documents. Nei...
  • Code review and bug tracking continues
    This is the tedious part of pre-release work ;o. I will release a new beta though, as soon as I possibly can. Although I've got new prob...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (1)
    • ▼  March (1)
      • Process Lasso and WDFME
  • ►  2012 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile