Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

Anti-virus software - the #1 cause of PC performance troubles

Posted on 22:56 by Unknown
Many users realize their anti-virus software consumes massive amounts of system resources, and hope that Process Lasso will somehow keep it in check. Sadly, this is not the case. I've probably written about this 100 separate times, in various emails, blogs, and forum posts. I figured I'd write about it again, here. A more formal document on the subject is still forthcoming.

All major anti-virus, anti-malware, and other security software has an on-demand/real-time scanner. For simplicity, I'll refer to all these products as anti-virus software.

The on-demand scanner is responsible for checking every file that is accessed on your PC. This means every time any application (process) needs to open a file, it must first WAIT for the anti-virus software to scan the file. This is why you should NEVER lower the priority of anti-virus software, as the whole system has to wait on it to finish its job anyway.

To improve performance, the on-demand scanner caches already scanned files. Unfortunately, this consumes more virtual memory, and can cause performance troubles of its own on PCs with relatively low amounts of RAM. (Side note: Another common performance problem, especially for low-RAM systems, is resident processes with memory leaks.. but that's another subject).

Process Lasso excludes common anti-virus software from ProBalance restraint, but for rare anti-virus software, you may need to manually exclude it from ProBalance restraint if you see log entries indicating it has been periodically restrained.

My recommendation is to reconfigure your anti-virus software's real-time scanner so that it is less aggressive. For instance, you can reduce the types of files it scans, or the types of events it scans upon. For instance, if it is set to scan files when they are opened and closed, you can change it to only scan them when opened.

If you temporarily disable your anti-virus software's real-time (on-demand) scanner completely, or uninstall it, you will likely see a noticeable improvement in system performance. You may also want to experiment with different anti-virus software, as some performs better than others. However, NEVER install more than one anti-virus product at a time.. NEVER.

I personally don't even use anti-virus software's real-time scanning because I can't stand the performance impact.

HOWEVER,  I would be negligent to mention that you expose yourself to a little more risk if you disable or reduce your anti-virus software's on-demand scanning. If you are careful about what is introduced onto your PC, you can mitigate this risk. Make NO changes if you do not understand the risks I am speaking of. Instead, perhaps try different anti-virus software (but never at the same time). Some is known to perform MUCH better than others. Again, make NO CHANGES if you do not understand the risks and accept full responsibility for theoretical consequences of those changes (infection of some sort or another).

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Process Lasso v3.65.3 beta released
    I've released the first new beta that is 100% UNICODE. I've regression tested almost all the software, though there may still be som...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.28
    This build continues maintenance, fixing several items and also making a nice improvement to the graph's display. Further, the last sele...
  • v5.0.0.18: Fix auto updater in XP
    During testing a few hours ago I noticed the auto-update was failing in some XP installations. Specifically, it would appear to stall at the...
  • BETA: Vista startup configuration
    Ok, I've got this fully correct now I think. In some cases in previous builds you could end up with both registry and Task Scheduler sta...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.48
    Changes: [.48]Change.GUI: Do not show 'Activate Now' menu item after activation [.48]Change.GUI: Adjusted logging thread CPU and I/O...
  • v5.0.0.17 final - Minor fixes
    This build fixes a reported issue with the watchdog rules (re: not default affinities, priorities, power schemes, but rather the terminate/r...
  • v5.0.0.21: Fix failure of web links within Process Lasso on some systems
    I've had reports of sporadic failure of the web links within Process Lasso. I've analyzed this situation for a while today and found...
  • One bit of bad news, one bit of good news
    One disappointing thing is that I've decided to cancel the change history shown in the update dialog, at least for v4.1. I may add it in...
  • Oh the frustration with this corporate crapware!!
    I now get uninstall feedback, as I solicit it (for better or worse). Once read, I can never go back, lol. Fortunately, most of it is actuall...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2012 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ▼  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ▼  March (6)
      • In accordance...
      • Can users see through the hype?
      • Anti-virus software - the #1 cause of PC performan...
      • Process Lasso v3.82.3 final
      • Process Lasso v3.82.2 final
      • ProBalance restrain by CPU affinity adjustment fea...
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile