Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 30 June 2010

A call to reject software bundles (e.g. browser toolbars)

Posted on 21:15 by Unknown
As a developer AND a user, I get frustrated with some trends in the shareware software industry. One particular gripe is in the bundling of toolbars, and I've mentioned it before. I must have accidentally installed Yahoo Toolbar at least 5 times during this PC's history, lol. I mean, come on... Sure, you can opt out, but most people just click through an install, perhaps not even noticing what else was installed.

After a while, you end up with so much crap installed that the PC runs sluggishly, especially for those Internet Explorer users for whom most add-ons are written for. Now you see the reason for Google's initial reluctance to allow any plug-ins with their Chrome browser.

I feel if you are downloading a program you have the *singular* intention to install that *specific* software, not anything else. I don't care how much they would pay, I will always and forever refuse bundling my software with free toolbars on ideological grounds. I will literally go out of business first.

I call all software developers to follow my lead here. It is not worth it. Please, no more freaking toolbars, browser add-ons, or other bundles! Your users will appreciate it. Take my advice for what you will - if you need convincing, I probably stand no chance of convincing you ;o.

I am certainly not perfect myself. After all, my software has a 'nag' screen. I don't mean to sound holier than thou. I simply mean that bundles are deceptive in nature and end up hurting the end user. The number one rule should always be "do no harm".
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Process Lasso v3.65.3 beta released
    I've released the first new beta that is 100% UNICODE. I've regression tested almost all the software, though there may still be som...
  • No more COM
    Years ago I wrote my process enumeration and management module. It primarily uses the NT Native API, giving it extended capabilities over th...
  • Licensed user update dialog - Activation code will be automatically populated in license validation box
    Licensed User Update Dialog  - Activation code will be automatically populated in license validation box First, to be clear, the license val...
  • Version 6 Goes Final
    Version 6 Goes Final as v6.0.0.58 I don't even know where to start with the changes, so I'm going to refer you to two documents. Nei...
  • v5.0.0.18: Fix auto updater in XP
    During testing a few hours ago I noticed the auto-update was failing in some XP installations. Specifically, it would appear to stall at the...
  • Nag annoyance reduced
    The battle to come up with a tolerable licensing system continues. I struggle with this, as I want my software to be completely free. Howeve...
  • Smaller minidumps means more submissions
    One of the changes in the last build was that I reduced the size of the minidumps that are generated in the rare event of a crash. They have...
  • One bit of bad news, one bit of good news
    One disappointing thing is that I've decided to cancel the change history shown in the update dialog, at least for v4.1. I may add it in...
  • Surprising Benchmarks on AMD Processors - Why the old Phenom II x6 remains a great CPU
    Surprising Benchmarks on AMD Processors The good old x6 Phenom II performs *almost* as fast as the latest unreleased generation of AMD proce...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2012 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ▼  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ▼  June (11)
      • A call to reject software bundles (e.g. browser to...
      • TrialPay extended to all home license types
      • A new way to 'buy' Process Lasso Pro for 'free'
      • v3.99.3 alpha released
      • v3.99.2 ALPHA released with Task Scheduler 2 integ...
      • v3.99.1 alpha released
      • v3.99.0 alpha released
      • Disable logging completely
      • v3.89.1 beta released
      • Something to get excited about - NEW process watch...
      • Dialog usability improvements
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile