Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 9 March 2011

Thank you for your continued crash dump submissions in the beta

Posted on 23:05 by Unknown
Although it keeps me busy, thank you for your continued crash dump submissions in the beta. This helps me to track down bugs, so v4.1 is hopefully the ultimate build of Process Lasso. Well, until v5 that is. Yes, the next planned version is that of v5. After all, I'm nearly done with the v4.1 code, so the version 5 improvements (of which there are many) are next to start hacking away at ;).

Oh, and I am issuing a new beta soon as I can, trust me on that. I am more eager than any user, I would love to issue it right now if it were ready. It almost is.
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Tuesday, 8 March 2011

Sorry, fixing startup config issues in Vista+

Posted on 07:32 by Unknown
I apologize for not releasing the new beta. Some users had emailed me, making me aware (or more aware perhaps) of certain bugs yet to be fixed, so I started work on them, and am now 'in the middle' of progress still. Don't worry, it will come very soon at this point. If I have to, I'll throw an intermediate build out there, but I'm preferring to wait until I get this one perfect.

Thanks for your patience.
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Monday, 7 March 2011

W2K Users: Latest beta has problems, am fixing

Posted on 17:23 by Unknown
During QA of the latest BETA I discovered I broke W2K compatibility again, in that it would crash in W2K. I have fixed this up for the next build. Don't worry, I always make sure W2K works before release ;). I won't forget about you, even if the rest of the world may seem to at times ;o.
Read More
Posted in | No comments

New beta coming, next 12 hours or so

Posted on 06:02 by Unknown
I'm glad to say I finally have a new beta coming, within 12 hours or so. I *may* also issue a new final build, but that is something I have not yet decided. v4.1 is so close it seems like a mute point.
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Sunday, 6 March 2011

Code review and bug tracking continues

Posted on 12:10 by Unknown
This is the tedious part of pre-release work ;o. I will release a new beta though, as soon as I possibly can. Although I've got new problems, I am just going to ignore them, despite their impact on business. It is all I can do. I know I run one of the cleanest and most ethical companies on the net, and have for over a decade. My users know that. The total story is quite long, but a 4th oopsie by SiteAdvisor on ProLasso.com has hurt sales because that is the domain I was using to send final purchasers to in previous builds (now changed, silently, so hundreds of thousands of copies still exist with that URL).

Meanwhile, as SA tries to fix its own internal algorithm problems, the reviewer that got banned from SiteAdvisor is using this as cannon fodder against both me and McAfee (he blames his ban on me for daring to point out that he 'hit' me with a defamatory remark amongst his 2 million site reviews.. but that had NOTHING to do with his ban that happened some 30 days later). He later recanted, twice -- because the first recant was so offensive. After his second recant, I had no issue with him. I just don't like being defamed, or having my integrity falsely attacked. I'm sure anyone can understand that.

Anyway, forget all that, working only here. I have no control, clearly ;). It doesn't matter how ethical I operate, a single false positive from years ago could be, and may be, the cause of these strange SA problems. We don't know because they make no accusations (same as prior 3 incidents they corrected), and their TrustedSource server is on the fritz. I have no more energy to fight.
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Friday, 4 March 2011

Back in the saddle, 'with it' again

Posted on 22:06 by Unknown
If the script kiddies want to continue their attack, let them. We, as a community, will get it cleaned up sometime afterwards. Back to work ;).

At present most recent anonymous attacks have been here:
http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/processlasso.com

THANKS to all those users who have kept me GREEN/SAFE thus far, in spite of this ;).

This shows just how much love I have back from my users. I really do appreciate it, and will try to pay it back to ya in every way possible.

Ok, new beta ;). Lets get this on out. There a bunch more crash reports I need to go through, so bare with me. I wanted to get some bugs worked out of this one.
Read More
Posted in | No comments

Thursday, 3 March 2011

Attack continues on ProcessLasso.com

Posted on 14:48 by Unknown
Despite a sterling reputation for 10 years, I've been ANONYMOUSLY attacked here: http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/processlasso.com ... The only defense I have is my users. So, please take the time to rate my site whatever you believe I deserve. I am partly being blamed for the banning of a reviewer (bot with 2+ million reviews) at McAfee SiteAdvisor who had made highly defamatory remarks about my site by mistake (generic text). He then recanted, but his first recant was more offensive than the accusation even (as if he and his lists were infallible). So, he recanted a second time. I didn't mention him again, but SiteAdvisor later removed his account and now I'm being blamed. As soon as his account was banned, this attack happened. Coincidence I'm sure.

I had MyWOT fix the initial attack, which occurred right as this ever-so-ethical, self-appointed guardian reviewer was banned. However, then his friend stepped in and complicated matters by bringing up stuff he knew to be long resolved at SiteAdvisor (they dug up my butt for a long time before correcting their false positive). So, MyWOT then UNFIXED the problem, and now I'm left only with my users to defend me.

These rating systems have all the power in the world, and this is the most important domain (obviously). It is my only profit generating product! (small profit, mind you, lol).

I am glad to say that users have come to my defense and properly rated me GREEN/SAFE in every category at EVERY rating service. Thank you ;). It is good to see a community come together, and nice to know that I am appreciated ;)
Read More
Posted in | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Process Lasso v3.65.3 beta released
    I've released the first new beta that is 100% UNICODE. I've regression tested almost all the software, though there may still be som...
  • Licensed user update dialog - Activation code will be automatically populated in license validation box
    Licensed User Update Dialog  - Activation code will be automatically populated in license validation box First, to be clear, the license val...
  • No more COM
    Years ago I wrote my process enumeration and management module. It primarily uses the NT Native API, giving it extended capabilities over th...
  • Licensing changes ... Yes, I still call it Free. Do you?
    Starting in Process Lasso v3.50, there have been a few minor changes to the licensing. The free build has these changes: ADDED a system tray...
  • Nag annoyance reduced
    The battle to come up with a tolerable licensing system continues. I struggle with this, as I want my software to be completely free. Howeve...
  • Version 6 Goes Final
    Version 6 Goes Final as v6.0.0.58 I don't even know where to start with the changes, so I'm going to refer you to two documents. Nei...
  • Code review and bug tracking continues
    This is the tedious part of pre-release work ;o. I will release a new beta though, as soon as I possibly can. Although I've got new prob...
  • Performance tests pass
    I'm happy to say that the GUI and governor uses virtually EXACTLY the same amount of CPU as the last version, despite all the new featur...
  • Fixing those annoying configuration dialogs
    I don't know about you, but when I use the configuration dialogs I think of how lazy the developer must be ;p. I am therefore cleaning t...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (1)
    • ▼  March (1)
      • Process Lasso and WDFME
  • ►  2012 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile