Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 3 January 2010

Clearing up misconceptions...

Posted on 07:03 by Unknown
Continuing from the last blog post, we'll move into clearing up some common misconceptions. These misconceptions affected the reviewer at CNET, and are therefore now getting propagated more widely. It takes a geek to truly understand Process Lasso, and that is one area I'm now working to fix by explaining things more clearly and with less jargon. I am glad I was made aware of these misconceptions.

Even though the new CNET review of Process Lasso was positive and recommended the software, the reviewer did not understand (or mention) the primary feature - ProBalance. The reviewer further was confused by the graph legend not being shown, because it auto-hid, but that's another subject and mentioned in the previous post.

Note that the older review of Process Supervisor (Process Lasso's old name) was also glowing AND properly described the software. It also gave it a 4 star rating, instead of a 3.5. I think it would be appropriate to simply switch to this older, more accurate review.

Anyway, I have made requests for them to update their review. I am hopeful that once these matters are cleared up, and they will give Process Lasso at least 4 stars. I suppose I should just be thankful the reviewer found it made such a difference in system performance, but the issue is that the understandably misinformed review is confusing users. I made my request politely, to ensure I don't piss off the 'editor'. After all, he or she did help me to see the product from a different perspective.

This misinformed review did help to me more clearly see some common misconceptions about Process Lasso. So, let's start clearing them up. I may add to this list as time passes.

Misconception #1: Process Lasso needs to be tweaked for your specific computer
Process Lasso is designed so that it operates well on any system without ANY configuration changes. You simply need to let Process Lasso's ProBalance do its thing - automatically lowering priorities of certain processes under specific conditions. There is no need to change any settings at all. Could you theoretically get a little more responsiveness out of your PC by changing Process Lasso settings? Yes.. but the additional gains would be marginal and it would require an expert and lots of trial and error to know what changes are appropriate for your specific PC. Therefore, its best to not make any changes - play it safe. This way, you know you get the benefits of ProBalance and can be sure of no harmful side-effects induced by inappropriate configuration changes.

Misconception #2: A user needs to set default priorities on their processes to rank their importance.
NO, PLEASE DON'T DO THIS. The idea isn't to reprioritize all your processes, rating them in importance to you. Doing that is risky and harmful to your PC performance. Just let Process Lasso do its job, UNLESS you know what you are doing.

Misconception #3: Process Lasso is only for geeks
No, its for anyone. Most people should simply install it and 'forget about it'. It'll be there, doing its job. Its interface may seem technical, but you don't ever have to use its interface. It just works.

Misconception #4: Process Lasso is only for older computers
While it may be true that older computers get the most benefit from Process Lasso, but Process Lasso is helpful to even brand new 'top of the line' PCs. Additionally, its extra features are quite handy for anyone (such as anti-sleep processes and High Performance Power processes). Those with a lot of CPU cores may also enjoy the default CPU affinty feature, where they can limit programs to specific CPUs - keeping the others free for use by other processes.

Lastly, I give a toast to 2010 and a hope for a good year of continued innovation here at Bitsum Technologies!
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.28
    This build continues maintenance, fixing several items and also making a nice improvement to the graph's display. Further, the last sele...
  • Anti-virus software - the #1 cause of PC performance troubles
    Many users realize their anti-virus software consumes massive amounts of system resources, and hope that Process Lasso will somehow keep it ...
  • Next update, Options menu gets some changes
    I decided to make the Options menu a little more consistent and move the ProBalnce configuration down with the rest of the rules configurati...
  • Optimizing process icon memory use & New core feature coming..
    Two in one post. Yes, here at Bitsum we're going Green by conserving bandwidth ;). Of course, that's just a joke and I fully support...
  • Indonesian language added - That makes 11
    Thanks to the work of Ivan Chin, an Indonesian (Bahasa Melayu) translation will be included in v3.99.36. This will be the first time even he...
  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Tightening the Governor
    Most users of Process Lasso are familiar with its core engine, ProcessGovernor.exe. It is the silent background process that applies all pro...
  • The many instances of Chrome
    As many readers of this blog may know, Google Chrome is different from other Windows web browsers. It isolates each of its tabs into an indi...
  • Process Lasso and WDFME
    Since Process Lasso can be complex for the layman, something we are working on, I wanted to list a set of steps to address the commonly abu...
  • BETA: Vista startup configuration
    Ok, I've got this fully correct now I think. In some cases in previous builds you could end up with both registry and Task Scheduler sta...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2012 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ▼  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ▼  January (6)
      • 3.80.2 update
      • Process Lasso v3.80 goes final
      • New features of 3.80 shown in images
      • v3.79.15 beta being released - nearly to v3.80
      • MagicJack users find Process Lasso ends call garble
      • Clearing up misconceptions...
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile