Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 27 December 2009

Running Process Lasso with Highest Rights - new beta improvements

Posted on 21:14 by Unknown
I'm approaching final for v3.80. I've accomplished all but a few items remaining on my list, then I'll enter the testing (and regression testing) stage.

Slowly over the course of the next few days, I'll introduce a few of the new features in v3.80. Today's feature is better automatic startup of Process Lasso with Highest Rights for Vista+ systems with UAC turned on.

As many of us know, Windows Defender blocks automatic startup of all applications that want to run with Highest Rights. You can't even create an ignore list. I reckon this is a good thing, from a big picture perspective.

If you are running Windows XP or below, this article doesn't apply to you. So, you can stop reading now unless you are curious.

Since many people need to run Process Lasso with Highest Rights, even though it is not normally recommended, we have further accommodated that capability. Remember, Highest Rights is the mode that allows any single instance of Process Lasso to view and manage the processes of all users (including system processes). In some cases, this is certainly desired. In most cases, its not.

Originally, I had planned to work around Windows Defender by adding Process Lasso to the Windows Task Scheduler's list of application to launch when a user logs in. However, I changed my mind and tried a different approach. I call it the 'proxied launch'.

While Windows Defender doesn't allow launching of High Rights processes, it does allow launching of low-rights processes, who can then launch a High Rights process. Of course, when done this way, the UAC elevation dialog is shown to the user. In current beta, its actually shown twice - once for the GUI and once for the core engine. I plan to lower that to once before final.

Whether or not this is the way I stay with, I don't know. As a side note, the user has the choice of using the proxied launch or not. Still, the official recommendation is to just let Process Lasso run with normal rights. The only exclusions to this rule are single-user systems where a system service needs managing, or servers where the processes of multiple users need managing by a single instance of Process Lasso running as a service.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.28
    This build continues maintenance, fixing several items and also making a nice improvement to the graph's display. Further, the last sele...
  • Tightening the Governor
    Most users of Process Lasso are familiar with its core engine, ProcessGovernor.exe. It is the silent background process that applies all pro...
  • Process Lasso and WDFME
    Since Process Lasso can be complex for the layman, something we are working on, I wanted to list a set of steps to address the commonly abu...
  • Indonesian language added - That makes 11
    Thanks to the work of Ivan Chin, an Indonesian (Bahasa Melayu) translation will be included in v3.99.36. This will be the first time even he...
  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Optimizing process icon memory use & New core feature coming..
    Two in one post. Yes, here at Bitsum we're going Green by conserving bandwidth ;). Of course, that's just a joke and I fully support...
  • Next update, Options menu gets some changes
    I decided to make the Options menu a little more consistent and move the ProBalnce configuration down with the rest of the rules configurati...
  • Anti-virus software - the #1 cause of PC performance troubles
    Many users realize their anti-virus software consumes massive amounts of system resources, and hope that Process Lasso will somehow keep it ...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.48
    Changes: [.48]Change.GUI: Do not show 'Activate Now' menu item after activation [.48]Change.GUI: Adjusted logging thread CPU and I/O...
  • WARNING: Beware of third-party utilities that adjust process priorities (other than Process Lasso)
    Recently I've seen either 'hacked on' additions to existing products, or new products, that have the ability to manipulate proce...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2012 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ▼  2009 (43)
    • ▼  December (6)
      • CNET 'Reviews' Process Lasso
      • The hazards of reading user reviews
      • Running Process Lasso with Highest Rights - new be...
      • WARNING: Beware of pirated copies of Process Lasso...
      • New low cost license experiment
      • The many instances of Chrome
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile