Windows 2000 Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 12 January 2012

AMD Bulldozer hotfix appears - changes Scheduler awareness of CPU from X real cores to 1/2 X real cores

Posted on 19:50 by Unknown
AMD Bulldozer hotfix appears - changes Scheduler awareness of CPU from X real cores to 1/2 X real cores

After appearing briefly a few weeks ago, then disappearing due to reported user complications, the AMD Bulldozer hotfixes for Windows have been re-released, or in the process of being re-released. A helpful supporter of Bitsum pointed this out. Over the course of the day, I noticed an additional download became available (at the first link).


This update DOES change the way the Windows sees your CPU, and can cause Process Lasso to deactivate under some scenarios. This is because it changes the CPU Scheduler's recognition of these AMD processors from (for example) 8 real cores to 4 real cores with 4 hyper-threaded (fake) cores. This is essentially a cheap hack to get performance on par and make use of TurboCore and the intrinsic characteristics of the Bulldozer architecture (e.g. shared L2 cache per 'module' of 2 cores) by telling the scheduler to keep its load on no more than 1/2 of the processors, if it can - and keep any large load off the other cores, if it can.


For example, before this update the below would read "[8 cores: 8 logical]". Meaning, 8 physical (real) cores, 8 total cores.




Now, as the reader can see, the OS thinks there are only 4 real cores, and 4 hyper-threaded (fake) cores. In this way, it is an easy and quick 'hack' to get the Scheduler to play nice with the Bulldozer platform and its 'paired' CPUs with shared L2 caches. Microsoft simply used the pre-existing support for HyperThreaded CPUs.


This will not hurt performance, it will help it. The other cores will get *fully* used under highly threaded situations, they are just avoided. These cores are also now frequently in a 'parked' state, so this update may conserve energy as well.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2645594
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2646060

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • WARNING: Cracks for Process Lasso may modify HOSTS file
    WARNING:  Cracks for Process Lasso have been seen to modify your system HOSTS file so that you can no longer access  bitsum.com  and/or  bit...
  • Process Lasso v3.65.3 beta released
    I've released the first new beta that is 100% UNICODE. I've regression tested almost all the software, though there may still be som...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.28
    This build continues maintenance, fixing several items and also making a nice improvement to the graph's display. Further, the last sele...
  • v5.0.0.18: Fix auto updater in XP
    During testing a few hours ago I noticed the auto-update was failing in some XP installations. Specifically, it would appear to stall at the...
  • Process Lasso v5.0.0.48
    Changes: [.48]Change.GUI: Do not show 'Activate Now' menu item after activation [.48]Change.GUI: Adjusted logging thread CPU and I/O...
  • One bit of bad news, one bit of good news
    One disappointing thing is that I've decided to cancel the change history shown in the update dialog, at least for v4.1. I may add it in...
  • Version 6 Goes Final
    Version 6 Goes Final as v6.0.0.58 I don't even know where to start with the changes, so I'm going to refer you to two documents. Nei...
  • Smaller minidumps means more submissions
    One of the changes in the last build was that I reduced the size of the minidumps that are generated in the rare event of a crash. They have...
  • 5.0.0.9 beta
    Sadly, my change in version naming did confuse some users who thought v5 was final already. Well, it is close, but not there --- I am rapidl...
  • Code review and bug tracking continues
    This is the tedious part of pre-release work ;o. I will release a new beta though, as soon as I possibly can. Although I've got new prob...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ▼  2012 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ▼  January (2)
      • More about Bulldozer
      • AMD Bulldozer hotfix appears - changes Scheduler a...
  • ►  2011 (166)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2010 (203)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (34)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (17)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (43)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile